10/23/2021 0 Comments Fusion Drive Vs Ssd For 2010 Mac Pro
I added two more 1TB drives into a second Raid which I used for my iTunes library and for file storage. For help with choosing an Internal SSD or Hard Drive, you can find your Mac by entering your Macs serial number here: Or selecting it by its Model Identifier here: Select your. We have a great range of Mac compatible drives, ideal for adding more storage to any MacBook, MacBook Pro, Mac Pro, or Mac mini that allows for internal drive upgrades.Tl dr: the WD black 2 is a SSD & HD in one nice package. Used some commands to make the paritions into a Fusion drive. Ran Disk Utility and paritioned the new drive as 120.03 GB and the rest as the other parition.This means that a Windows Bootcamp setup will be much slower than a native OS X setup, because it's on the HD. I wanted a 128GB SSD, and a 1TB HDD visible to me, so that I had granular control of what went where.An additional downside of Fusion is that you can only create one additional partition when you have a Fusion drive, and that extra partition HAS to be on the larger, slower HD. It works pretty well.Except. These two drives appear as one drive to the operating system, and CoreStorage intelligently moves data around to get the best combination of speed and storage for the user. Normal HDs are cheap with lots of storage space, but they are much slower than SSDs.Apple use a bit of arcane magic at file system level.
Fusion Drive Vs Ssd For 2010 Pro Mac By EnteringIf my back-up regime was flawed, I was FUBARed.I booted into my OS X Recovery partition and launched a Terminal. The actual act of decoupling the two drives destroys the data on both of the drives AND my Windows partition. It was.I took a deep breath. I now have 18GB of OS and Apps on my OS X SSD, and 22GB of media on my HDD. After pointing iPhoto and iTunes at their respective libraries. I then deleted some stuff from the SSD, and moved my iPhoto and iTunes library to the HDD. I had 45GB on my SSD, and nothing on the HDD. All was good! I then restored my SuperDuper backup to SSD, put the kettle on, and rebooted.It was perfect. So far so good!I booted into my OS X backup clone, and formatted the SSD and HDD to be OS X journaled partitions. Everything was exactly as it should have been. I then restored my Windows backup to the Windows partition.WinClone worked flawlessly. I created a 61GB SSD partition for Windows. I went and had a meal and a beer or two and came back and ran Bootcamp Assistant. I'm not sure either if I like fusion (not using it). I really do believe in paying for quality software, and having the right tools for the job.Nice. My Windows experience index jumped from 5.9 to 7.7 so I'm happy with that!Everything works, and SWTOR (and my iMac in general) has a whole new lease of life.WinClone and SuperDuper are excellent pieces of software, and really kicked it out of the park for me. 32GB RAM and an i7 also help, but the SSD is epic. Late 2014 mac for saleWhat I would appreciate Apple do is allow to pick you the SSD drive size for your Fusion drive when you order a BTO Mac: while 128gb is probably enough for most users, some specific use cases could really benefit from a say: 512gb sad + 3tb drive configuration. Intel Smart response is more RAID1-like, most-often requested data is copied to the SSD (but not moved, like with Fusion) - you can survive the loss of the SSD, as all your data is still on the mechanical disk, but you lose some usable space.I think both are a great thing: while SSD prices keep on going down, 512gb and larger drives are still prohibitely expensive, with Fusion drive and Intel Smart Response you can get "1-2TB of fast drive space on the cheap". There is a big difference though: Fusion is essentially a RAID0-like array of 2 drives, so you do get the combined space, but at the cost of less overall reliability - if you lose either 1 drive, all your data is gone.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJared ArchivesCategories |